XM مقابل IC بازارFull 2026 Comparison — Spreads, Min. Deposit, Leverage & Who Should Choose Which
IC Markets leads on raw spread quality. XM leads on accessibility, bonuses, and Islamic accounts. Based on live accounts at both brokers, here is the objective comparison.
Affiliate disclosure: we earn commission from XM links · IC Markets links are not affiliate · Comparison is editorially independent
$5 minimum deposit · No deposit bonus + 50% deposit bonus · Islamic swap-free on Ultra Low · Traders who want no commission · Beginners · SEA local payment methods
Tightest raw spreads (EUR/USD from 0.0 pip) · High-volume scalpers · ASIC + CySEC regulated · cTrader platform availability · No inactivity fee
XM vs IC Markets — Full Comparison Table
| Category | XM | IC Markets | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| حداقل سپرده | $5 (Micro/Standard) | $200 (all accounts) | XM ✓ |
| EUR/USD Spread (best acct) | ~0.7 pip (Ultra Low, no comm) | ~0.02 pip (Raw, + $3.50/lot) | IC Markets ✓ |
| Total Cost at 1 lot EUR/USD | ~$7 (Ultra Low) | ~$7–8 (spread + comm) | Similar |
| هیچ جایزه سپرده | ✓ Yes (~$30) | Real madrid unido ™ No | XM ✓ |
| 50% Deposit Bonus | ✓ Yes | Real madrid unido ™ No | XM ✓ |
| حساب اسلامی | ✓ Micro, Standard, Ultra Low | ✗ Not available | XM ✓ |
| مقررات | CySEC, ASIC, DFSA, IFSC (+2) | ASIC, CySEC, FSA (Seychelles) | Both regulated |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, WebTrader, Mobile | MT4, MT5, cTrader | IC Markets ✓ |
| Inactivity Fee | $10/month after 90 days | هیچ کدام | IC Markets ✓ |
| Trading Before KYC | ✓ Yes | ✗ No (KYC required first) | XM ✓ |
| حداکثر اهرم | 1:1000 (IFSC) | 1:500 (FSA entity) | XM ✓ |
✓ Bottom Line
XM wins for beginners, bonus seekers, Muslim traders, and those wanting a simple no-commission spread account from $5. IC Markets wins for experienced scalpers who trade high volume and want the absolute tightest raw spread with cTrader access. The total trading cost at 1 standard lot is approximately equal between both brokers — the difference is in accessibility and extras.
Who Should Choose XM vs IC Markets?
- →Starting with less than $200
- →Want the no deposit or 50% deposit bonus
- →Muslim trader needing Islamic account
- →Prefer no-commission spread accounts
- →Want to trade before KYC is approved
- →Need local payment methods (Indonesia, Malaysia)
- →You are a high-volume scalper (2+ lots/trade)
- →You want the cTrader platform
- →You prioritise absolute tightest raw spread
- →No inactivity fee matters to you
- →You can deposit $200+ and do not need bonuses
Spreads & Execution — Detailed Breakdown
IC Markets is widely regarded as one of the tightest-spread brokers in the retail space. Their Raw account averages EUR/USD 0.02–0.08 pip during London session — genuinely near-zero. XM Ultra Low averages 0.6–0.8 pip. The difference is real and significant for high-frequency traders.
However, IC Markets charges $3.50/lot/side commission on Raw accounts. At 1 standard lot: IC Markets total cost = ~$0.80 spread + $7.00 commission = $7.80. XM Ultra Low = $7.00 spread, no commission. At 1 lot, XM Ultra Low is marginally cheaper. At 5 lots: IC Markets = $4.00 + $35.00 = $39.00. XM = $35.00. IC Markets still costs more at 5 lots due to commission structure. The advantage only becomes clear at very high volumes (10+ lots) where the near-zero spread compounds.
Platform Comparison
Both brokers offer MT4 and MT5. IC Markets additionally offers cTrader — a platform preferred by many experienced traders for its depth of market view, one-click trading, and cleaner interface. XM counters with its proprietary WebTrader (TradingView-based) and mobile app with copy trading. If cTrader is a requirement, IC Markets is the only option — XM does not offer cTrader.
Execution Quality
IC Markets uses ECN execution — your order goes directly to liquidity providers without a dealing desk. XM uses market execution with no dealing desk on Ultra Low and Zero accounts (STP execution). In practice, at retail order sizes (0.01–10 lots), execution quality is comparable between the two brokers. Both offer negative balance protection and no re-quotes policy.
Regulation, Safety & Withdrawal
Both brokers are well-regulated. XM holds licences from CySEC (Cyprus/EU), ASIC (Australia), DFSA (Dubai), IFSC (Belize), SCA (UAE), and FSCA (South Africa) — six regulatory bodies. IC Markets holds ASIC (Australia), CySEC (Cyprus/EU), and FSA (Seychelles) licences. Both maintain segregated client funds and offer negative balance protection.
For withdrawal speed: both brokers process e-wallet withdrawals (Skrill, Neteller) within 24 business hours. IC Markets typically processes same-day for most methods. XM's Skrill withdrawal tested at 2–6 hours in our experience. Neither is as fast as Exness which processes instantly and automatically.
A key practical advantage for XM: you can deposit and trade before KYC is approved. IC Markets requires KYC verification before you can access the trading platform at all. For traders who want to start immediately after registration, XM has a structural advantage.
IC Markets wins on raw spread and cTrader access. XM wins on minimum deposit ($5 vs $200), bonuses, Islamic accounts, and the ability to trade before KYC approval. At 1 standard lot, total trading cost is approximately equal between both brokers. Choose based on your specific priorities — there is no universal winner.
Frequently Asked Questions — XM vs IC Markets
Open XM Account — From $5
Better for beginners, bonus hunters, and Islamic account holders. No deposit bonus available in eligible regions. Start from just $5 on a Micro account.
Affiliate disclosure: we earn commission from XM links · IC Markets links are not affiliate · Comparison is editorially independent